Copyright ©2011 by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute
Distributed under an Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
Bp. of
Acta sanctorum martyrum I [1748]); and
2. the longer ‘History of Shemʿon’ (first published by P. Bedjan, Acta martyrum et sanctorum II [1891]). Both texts
were published by M. Kmosko in 1907, who called them MS1 ‘Recensio
antiquior’ and MS2 ‘Recensio recentior’, respectively. Both texts are
preserved in mss. that contain larger collections of E.-Syr. martyrdoms,
which mostly are joined together with hagiographies and martyrdoms of the
W.-Syr. tradition. One of the primary mss. for the ‘Martyrdom’, Vat. Syr.
160, is of disputed date (some parts of the ms. are from the 6th cent., but
for this particular part Assemani proposed a 10th-cent. date, which seems
too late); the other mss. are from the 9th cent. and later, belonging to
either the E.-Syr. or the W.-Syr. tradition.
According to both Syriac texts, Shemʿon was arrested when he refused to comply with a royal order to raise a double tax from the Christian community. This happened probably in 340, when the Sasanian king Shapur II (309–379) was engaged in warfare with the Romans and the Persian Christians came under the suspicion of sympathizing with the Romans. In the introduction to the ‘Martyrdom’ the predicament of the Christians is compared with the oppression of the Jews in the time of the Maccabees, and the ‘two priests’, Judas (Maccabaeus) and Shemʿon, are portrayed as fighting for the same cause. Arrested in Seleucia, Shemʿon was transported to Karka d-Ledan, in Beth Huzaye, where he had several meetings with the king. A long subplot (in both Syr. texts and in Sozomen) concerns Shemʿon’s encounter with the defector Gushtazad, who upon seeing Shemʿon decided to return to his Christian faith and became a martyr even before Shemʿon. After having been given ample opportunity to rescind his position and to pay homage to the king and his gods, Shemʿon is executed. While the ‘History’, to a certain extent, expands on the ‘Martyrdom’, Wiessner has argued convincingly that the author of the ‘History’ had access to additional sources and in some cases deliberately updated the ‘Martyrdom’ theologically and ideologically. For both the ‘Martyrdom’ and the ‘History’ the question arises as to what extent they may be used as historical sources, a question that becomes even more pertinent if one takes into consideration that there were several decades between the events that are reported and the redaction of the texts. The final redaction probably took place in the early 5th cent., or — in the case of the ‘History’ — well into the 5th cent.
Several other martyr texts deal with the persecution under Shapur II. Among
the texts that are most closely related to the Shemʿon texts are the
Martyrdom of Tarbo, Shemʿon’s sister (ed. Bedjan, AMS
2, 254–60) and the Martyrdom of Pusay (or Pusayk) and Marta (ibid., 208–32
and 233–41).
See also Martyrs and persecutions.